B. V. D. Zandschulp
To Win
J. M. Cerundolo
To Win
Mikael Ymer vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L W L W L L
Form
L W W L L W L W L WHead To Head: Ymer 3 - 1 Zandschulp
They have played 11 sets in total, with Ymer winning 7 and Zandschulp winning 4. The last match between Ymer and Zandschulp was at the Rothesay International - Eastbourne, 27-06-2023, First, Grass with Mikael Ymer getting the victory 3-6 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mikael Ymer | 3 |
| Botic Van De Zandschulp | 1 |
Rothesay International - Eastbourne(27-06-2023)
3
6
6
4
6
2
| Ymer | Stats | Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| 64% (7-4) | YTD Win/Loss | 45% (10-12) |
| 3 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 751 | Ranking | 88 |
| 50 | Highest Rank | 22 |
| 26 | Age | 29 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 7 | Titles | 7 |
| 63% (285-171) | Career Total W/L | 62% (363-226) |
| $1,465,685 | Career Prize Money | $3,456,920 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
22 Apr 2025 / Q3
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Bergs VS Nishioka PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Maneiro VS Sherif PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Ymer VS Zandschulp H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Mikael Ymer
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
54 of
94)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
1
Aces
8
10
Double Faults
3
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
90
|
||||
| 3-6 6-3 6-3 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Mikael Ymer
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
69%
(
69 of
100)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
100)
94
Total Points Won
85
|
||||
| 6-4 2-6 6-2 |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
71%
(
56 of
79)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
7
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
48%
(
26 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
23 of
39)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
||||
Ymer VS Zandschulp H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 7 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 53 | Games Won | 44 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 15 |
| 21 | Total Double Faults | 16 |
| 1:57:35 | Average Match Time | 1:57:35 |
| 63% (205/327) | 1st Serve % | 64% (176/276) |
| 66% (135/205) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (111/176) |
| 47% (57/122) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (46/100) |
| 58% (18/31) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (15/29) |
| 43% (119/276) | Return Points Win % | 41% (135/327) |
| 75% (3/4) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 25% (1/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (2/3) | Deciding Set Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 67% (3/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 33% (3/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 33% (3/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mikael Ymer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Billy Harris
Player
Mikael Ymer
60%
(
75 of
125)
1st Serve %
59%
(
71 of
121)
6
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
6
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
71)
56%
(
28 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
50 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
51 of
121)
126
Total Points Won
120
|
6-7(6) 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Mikael Ymer
63%
(
57 of
91)
1st Serve %
65%
(
63 of
97)
14
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
48 of
63)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
29 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
97)
94
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Julien De Cuyper
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Mikael Ymer
68%
(
59 of
87)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
83)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Viktor Durasovic
65%
(
65 of
100)
1st Serve %
59%
(
64 of
108)
4
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
108)
106
Total Points Won
102
|
6-3 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| F |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
57%
(
50 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
89
Total Points Won
72
|
6-1 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Daniil Glinka
61%
(
59 of
96)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
90)
2
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
70%
(
26 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
32 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
90)
97
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(2) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Norbert Gombos
65%
(
68 of
105)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
98)
0
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
5
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
30%
(
11 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
50%
(
52 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
98)
99
Total Points Won
104
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Moise Kouame
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Roberto Bautista Agut
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
11
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Novak Djokovic
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
87
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Nick Kyrgios
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(7) 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
39%
(
21 of
54)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (285/171) | Win/Loss | 62% (363/226) |
| 58% (648/476) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (826/589) |
| 53% (5590/5041) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (7093/6267) |
| 61% (59/38) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (68/49) |
| 60% (101/67) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (170/104) |
| 67% (112/54) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66% (114/60) |
| 52% (13/12) | Grass Win/Loss | 46% (11/13) |
| 0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.44 |
| 954 | Aces Total | 2874 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 1248 | Total Double Faults | 2136 |
| 1:37:55 | Average Match Time | 1:35:28 |
| 416.76 | Average Opponent Rank | 385.29 |
| 66% (20600/31022) | 1st Serve % | 62% (23961/38923) |
| 65% (13449/20600) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (17121/23961) |
| 49% (5056/10422) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (7213/14965) |
| 44% (1471/3328) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1773/4112) |
| 42% (12690/30520) | Return Points Win % | 41% (16314/40115) |
| 53% (19/17) | Slam W/L | 62% (32/20) |
| 48% (12/13) | Masters W/L | 51% (26/25) |
| 67% (16/8) | Cups W/L | 63% (12/7) |
| 50% (60/60) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (66/65) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 68% (122/57) | Challenger W/L | 63% (72/42) |
| 78% (56/16) | Futures W/L | 70% (155/67) |
| 64% (265/412) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (336/538) |
| 47% (17/36) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 53% (20/38) |
| 50% (61/122) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (100/181) |
| 65% (109/168) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (112/194) |
| 89% (253/224) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (342/303) |
| 11% (253/28) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (342/38) |
| 29% (203/59) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (245/59) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
